A set of answers needs connections
Four answers can each sound plausible while describing incompatible versions of events. After reviewing the fields individually, write a short account connecting them. Keep it factual and source-based: who acted, what action the evidence supports, why it was taken and when it fits the sequence. If the connecting sentences require new assumptions, those assumptions deserve attention before submission.
Worked example: a borrowed object
Your method depends on an object being used at a certain time, but a documented loan places it elsewhere until later. Changing the moment may make the object available while removing the suspect's opportunity. The problem cannot be solved by checking each field in isolation. Compare the linked constraints and revise the theory that connects them.
Use the file as the limit
Somatry's investigation centers on reading the records, flagging evidence and submitting a report. You do not need an invented off-screen event to make every selected answer coexist. If your explanation depends on an unrecorded transfer, conversation or journey, identify whether the supplied materials genuinely support it. A consistent report should explain the relevant records together, not merely assemble the four most suspicious-looking details into one set of responses.